Oglesby & Meador v. Hynds Mfg. Co.
This text of 96 Ga. 748 (Oglesby & Meador v. Hynds Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It affirmatively appearing that the plaintiffs in execution did not consent to a sale of the entire estate in the mortgaged property, that their counsel, before the sale, had informed counsel of the mortgagees that they would not so consent, and had also notified the crowd in attendance upon the sale that only the equity of redemption would be sold,, nothing passed at the sale except that equity, and the plaintiffs in execution are not estopped from so asserting, merely because counsel for the mortgagees announced at the sale that the entire property would be sold and that the purchaser would get a good title; especially when it appears that on a former trial of this case the same counsel admitted in open court that the plaintiffs in execution had made no such consent. The case is in no way substantially different from what it was when before this court at the October term, 1893 (93 Ga. 542), and the questions now made are controlled by the general principles then announced. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 Ga. 748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oglesby-meador-v-hynds-mfg-co-ga-1895.