Oglesbee v. State

100 S.E. 722, 24 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 558
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 14, 1919
Docket10660
StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 722 (Oglesbee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oglesbee v. State, 100 S.E. 722, 24 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 558 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Broyles, G. J.

1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which the special ground of the motion for a new trial was based is both cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would probably produce a different result if a new trial were granted.

2. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 722, 24 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oglesbee-v-state-gactapp-1919.