Oglesbee v. State
This text of 100 S.E. 722 (Oglesbee v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The alleged newly discovered evidence upon which the special ground of the motion for a new trial was based is both cumulative and impeaching in its character, and is not such evidence as would probably produce a different result if a new trial were granted.
2. There was ample evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.E. 722, 24 Ga. App. 276, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oglesbee-v-state-gactapp-1919.