Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States

Court of Claims

Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States

230 Ct. Cl. 979, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 257, 1982 WL 25294

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMay 14, 1982

DocketNo. 409-81T

StatusPublished

This text of 230 Ct. Cl. 979 (Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States, 230 Ct. Cl. 979, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 257, 1982 WL 25294 (cc 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This federal income tax refund suit, before us on cross-motions for summary judgment, presents a complicated question involving the determination of the plaintiffs investment tax credit. As the defendant concedes, the identical issue was resolved in favor of the plaintiff for earlier years, Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 749, 610 F.2d 715 (1979), and that decision controls the present case.

The government argues that the prior case was decided incorrectly and should be overruled. The full court, however, denied the government’s request that we hear this case en banc, and the prior decision binds the panel.

The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Judgment is entered for the plaintiff for $228,053, with interest as provided by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This federal income tax refund suit, before us on cross-motions for summary judgment, presents a complicated question involving the determination of the plaintiffs investment tax credit. As the defendant concedes, the identical issue was resolved in favor of the plaintiff for earlier years, Oglebay Norton Co. v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 749, 610 F.2d 715 (1979), and that decision controls the present case.

The government argues that the prior case was decided incorrectly and should be overruled. The full court, however, denied the government’s request that we hear this case en banc, and the prior decision binds the panel.

The plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is granted, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied. Judgment is entered for the plaintiff for $228,053, with interest as provided by law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 Ct. Cl. 979, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 257, 1982 WL 25294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oglebay-norton-co-v-united-states-cc-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack