Ogle v. Manlove
This text of 32 N.E. 823 (Ogle v. Manlove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action in the Circuit Court by the appellants against the appellees, to enjoin the latter from opening a certain public highway in Tipton County, established by the board' of commissioners. To certain answers filed by the appellees the court overruled a demurrer, to which ruling the appellants excepted. This ruling is assigned as error.
No brief is filed by the appellants, except what is called a supersedeas brief. In this so-called brief no authority is cited, nor is any argument attempted. There is no attempt to point out any error in the ruling of the Circuit Court.
This is not a compliance with rule twenty of this court.
The appeal should be dismissed on account of the failure of the appellants to comply with the terms of this rule. City of Anderson v. Neal, 88 Ind. 317; Louisville, etc., R. W. Co. v. Grantham, 104 Ind. 353.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 N.E. 823, 133 Ind. 55, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogle-v-manlove-ind-1892.