Home/New York Court of Appeals/Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION

Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION

796 N.E.2d 475, 100 N.Y.2d 576, 764 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 1772
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 2, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 796 N.E.2d 475 (Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION, 796 N.E.2d 475, 100 N.Y.2d 576, 764 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 1772 (N.Y. 2003).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the granting of summary judgment to McDonald’s Corporation, Vincent Amari and Catherine Norce dismissing the complaint against them, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ROSSNER v. Parson
796 N.E.2d 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
796 N.E.2d 475, 100 N.Y.2d 576, 764 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 1772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogilvie-v-mcdonalds-corportion-ny-2003.