Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION
796 N.E.2d 475, 100 N.Y.2d 576, 764 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 1772
Opinion
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that part of the Appellate Division order that affirmed the granting of summary judgment to McDonald’s Corporation, Vincent Amari and Catherine Norce dismissing the complaint against them, denied; motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the remainder of the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION, 796 N.E.2d 475, 100 N.Y.2d 576, 764 N.Y.S.2d 384, 2003 N.Y. LEXIS 1772 (N.Y. 2003).
796 N.E.2d 475 (Ogilvie v. MCDONALD'S CORPORTION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ROSSNER v. Parson
796 N.E.2d 475 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)