Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain Railroad v. Nashua & Lowell Railroad

112 U.S. 311, 5 S. Ct. 161, 28 L. Ed. 740, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1885
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 24, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 112 U.S. 311 (Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain Railroad v. Nashua & Lowell Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ogdensburgh & Lake Champlain Railroad v. Nashua & Lowell Railroad, 112 U.S. 311, 5 S. Ct. 161, 28 L. Ed. 740, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1885 (1884).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Miller

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire, dismissing the bill of appellant,, who was complainant below.

The plaintiff is the owner of a railroad commencing at Ogdensburgh on Lake Ontario, and terminating at Plattsburgh on Lake Champlain. The defendant-owns a road between Nashua and Lowell. The Yennont and Canada B. R. Co., the Yermont Central R. R. Co., the Northern R. R. Co, of New Hampshire, the Concord RJ»R. Co. of New Hampshire, the Nashua & Lowell of New Hampshire, and the Boston & Lowell of Massachusetts, were all largely interested in the freight and passenger business which came over the Ogdensburgh road from the great lakes for points in New England and Canada, and which went from the latter to the lakes.

[313]*313The Vermont Central and the Vermont and Canada companies were, in the hands of receivers, or trustees, appointed by courts under whose control they were, and these trustees had a lease of the Ogdensburgh road for twenty years from March 1, 1810. In this condition of the affairs of these companies a contract was made between them all except the Concord company, the object of which was to secure an increased traffic over all these roads by obtaining control of the Northern Transportation Company of Ohio, which was also a party to the contract, and which was engaged in. steamboat transportar tion on the Western lakes. One of the items of this agreement ' was that the Ogdensburgh company should advance a sum not' exceeding $600,000 to secure this control, which it did, and the .only question on the present appeal is whether by virtue of the contract the several railroad companies which were parties to it, were bound to repay to the appellant this money at all events, or were only bound to pay out of receipts from the traffic which came to them severally from this- transportation company over the Ogdensburgh road. This requires a careful-examination of the contract, and a consideration of the circumstances under which it was made. The agreement is as follows:

“Articles of agreement between the Northern Transportation Company of Ohio, a corporation established under the laws of Ohio, party of the first part; ’ J. Gregory Smith, of St. Albans, Vermont, and George Stark, of Nashua, New Hampshire, parties of the second part; and the trustees and Managers of the Vermont Central and Vermont and Canada Railroad Companies, the Northern Railroad of New Hampshire (the Concord Railroad Corporation of New Hampshire, provided they execute tiffs agreement), the Nashua and Lowell Railroad Corporation of - New Hampshire and Massachusetts, and the Boston and Lowell Railroad Corporation of Massachusetts, parties of the third part; and the Ogdensburgh _and Lake Champlain Railroad Company, the party of the fourth part.
“ Whereas the above-named railroad companies and trustees and managers which have become parties to agreements [314]*314hereto annexed, bearing date the twenty-fourth day of February, a.d. 1870, and whose tracks- forms a large part of the ' connecting line between Boston, in Massachusetts, and Ogdensburgh, in New York, depend largely for their business upon the. regular transportation by steamers of freight and passengers between said Ogdensburgh and the Western cities and towns upon the great lakes; and whereas the party of the first part was chartered to carry on the business of such transportation, but by reason of financial embarrassments is unable to carry it on efficiently, and it is feared that its steamers may be taken from this line; and whereas the parties of the third part and the party of the fourth part believe it to be for their and the public interest to advance or lend to the parties of the second part some portion of the gross receipts for the transportation of freight and passengers to be brought to and from their line by the steamers of the party of the first part, in order to secure the most regular, efficient, and permanent service by steamers between Ogdensburgh and said Western cities and •towns for the term of nineteen years from the.-first day of March, a.d. 1871; and whereas the parties of the second part have agreed to use all sums advanced or lent to them to secure the ownership or the control of the stock of said party of the first, part, and otherwise to secure the most efficient management of its business to carry out the purposes of this agreement, and for no other purposes, and to hold all said stock which they may hold or control, and all other property or rights rvhich they may purchase or otherwise acquire rvith said funds, except debts due from said party of the first part, in trust to secure the repayment of all sums which may be so advanced or lent as aforesaid, with interest as hereinafter provided.
Now, therefore, in consideration of the premises, it is covenanted and agreed between said parties as follows:
Article First.- — That the party of the first part shall, during said term, continue to hold and own as many and as serviceable steamers as it now has, and will keep them properly equipped, seaworthy, and in good running order, and will make such addition to the number of said boats as the business shall require, and will run them for the transportation of freight and pas-. [315]*315sengers between, said Ogdensburgh and said Western cities and towns, at such time, and in such manner, and at such rate of freight and fare as shall be satisfactory to the executive committee of the parties of the third part for the time being, or if there be no such executive committee, or there is any legal impediment to their action, to the satisfaction of the presidents, for the time being, of the third and fourth parties, or a majority of them. , And that the party of the first part will keep ali other property owned by it in good repair and in serviceable condition, and that so far as may be practicable during, said term, it will send all freight and passengers for points east of Ogdensburgh over the lines of the roads of the parties of the third and fourth parts.
A schedule of said steamers and other property is hereto annexed,
Article Second. — That the parties of the third part, will, during said term, semi-annually reserve out of the gross receipts, either upon said line or upon any road now leased or • operated, or which may hereafter be leased or operated by the parties of the third part, or either of them,, for the transportation of freight and passengers brought to said line at Ogdensburgh by the steamers of the party of the first part, the sum of one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, or so much thereof as shall be adequate for the purposes herein set forth,' and pay over the same to the parties of the second part to be used for the purpose of securing regular, efficient, and adequate service to and from said Ogdensburgh as aforesaid, and the party of the fourth part will, in case it shall be necessary to secure the regular and efficient running of said steamers to and from said Ogdensburgh, when called upon by parties of the second part, advance, from time to time, sums not in all exceeding six hundred thousand dollars, to be used by said parties of the second part for the same purposes as said semi-annual payments, and to be pro tanto

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. T & N PLC
905 F. Supp. 107 (S.D. New York, 1995)
Lecoureier v. The American Bark Hawaiian Isles
3 D. Haw. 101 (D. Hawaii, 1906)
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Peterson
162 U.S. 346 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Ogdensburg & L. C. R. Co. v. Nashua & L. R. Co. 1
112 U.S. 311 (Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 U.S. 311, 5 S. Ct. 161, 28 L. Ed. 740, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogdensburgh-lake-champlain-railroad-v-nashua-lowell-railroad-scotus-1884.