Ogden v. United States

Court of Claims

Ogden v. United States

1 Ct. Cl. 96

DecidedOctober 15, 1863

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ct. Cl. 96 (Ogden v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ogden v. United States, 1 Ct. Cl. 96 (cc 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

‘The Court, per

Hughes, J.:

It is the opinion of the court that the payments of money sought to be recovered back in these suits were voluntary payments within the meaning of the law, and that no action therefor can be maintained.

The petitions are dismissed.

Loring, J.:

As these cases arise under the revenue laws, I am of opinion this •court has not jurisdiction of them for the reasons stated in my opinion in the case of B. Schlesinger et als. vs. The United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

‘The Court, per

Hughes, J.:

It is the opinion of the court that the payments of money sought to be recovered back in these suits were voluntary payments within the meaning of the law, and that no action therefor can be maintained.

The petitions are dismissed.

Loring, J.:

As these cases arise under the revenue laws, I am of opinion this •court has not jurisdiction of them for the reasons stated in my opinion in the case of B. Schlesinger et als. vs. The United States.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ct. Cl. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogden-v-united-states-cc-1863.