Ogden v. State

701 So. 2d 673, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13290, 1997 WL 730718
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ogden v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 658 So. 2d 621
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1997·No. No. 97-489·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a proceeding in which the appellant sought enforcement of an order granting postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In the rule 3.850 order the court cited Lowell v. State, 652 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), and Jennings v. State, 645 So.2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), and indicated that a probationary condition “concerning intoxicants” was stricken. However, a subsequently entered amended order of probation contained the same conditions regarding intoxicants. Because we are unsure as to the extent of relief which the court intended in the rule 3.850 order, and in light of the further uncertainty ensuing from the subsequent amended order of probation, the challenged order on the motion to enforce is reversed as to this matter. The order is otherwise affirmed, and the case is remanded for clarification or other appropriate action as to the conditions concerning intoxicants.

MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogden v. State, 701 So. 2d 673, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13290, 1997 WL 730718 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

701 So. 2d 673 (Ogden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jennings v. State
645 So. 2d 592 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Lowell v. State
652 So. 2d 975 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)