Ogden v. State
115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 685
This text of 115 So. 925 (Ogden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ogden v. State, 115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still, and appeals. On consideration of this record by the court en bane, we are of the opinion that the motion for new trial should have been granted. It is therefore ordered that the affirmance be set aside, judgment reversed, and the cause remanded. Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
115 So. 925, 22 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogden-v-state-alactapp-1928.