Ogden v. Lyman
This text of 1 Day 34 (Ogden v. Lyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
refused to erase it.
The plaintiff then withdrew his suit* The defendant entered for costs, and moved the Court to assess damages in his favour, and, as such, to allow interest on the judgment below. This was objected to, by the plaintiff’s Counsel, on the ground, that as the writ of error was not dated, it could not be a supersedeas.
The Court, by the easting vote of the Governor, refused to allow the damages, but allowed costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Day 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogden-v-lyman-conn-1802.