Ogden v. Dildine
3 N.J.L. 413
Opinion
It hath been repeatedly decided that there must be a subsisting action depending in the justice’s court before it can be referred; this judgment is also entered in figures.; it must, for these causes, be reversed.
I. JET. Williamson, att’y for plaintiff.
Cited in Berrian v. State, 2 Zab. 9-36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ogden v. Dildine, 3 N.J.L. 413 (N.J. 1808).
3 N.J.L. 413 (Ogden v. Dildine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.