Ogden v. Devlin

13 Jones & S. 631
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedNovember 11, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Jones & S. 631 (Ogden v. Devlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ogden v. Devlin, 13 Jones & S. 631 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Opinion

Freedman, J.,

wrote for reversal, holding the proposition stated in the head-note ; and further holding that [632]*632defendants’ motion should be granted by, the entry of an order providing that it be referred to a referee to ascertain and determine what amount, if any, is due to the attorney of record for his services rendered as attorney and counsel, and that, upon the coming in and confirmation of the report of said referee, and the payment by the defendants of the amount so reported due, if any, and the expenses of said reference, Frank J. Dupignac be substituted as the attorney for the defendants in the place and stead of Charles Gr. Dahlgren.

Curtis, Ch. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Jones & S. 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogden-v-devlin-nysuperctnyc-1879.