Ogburn v. Teague

67 N.C. 355
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Reade, J.

The statute makes the value of the property the guide for the verdict • of the jury. The estimate put upon it by the parties at the time of the sale was, to say the least, [357] some evidence of its value, and was properly left to the jury, with the other evidence in the case.

The objection, that his Honor'allowed the blank endorsement to be tilled up, is without torce. It. was within the discretion of his Honor, and is usually -treated as a matter of course.

There is no error.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogburn v. Teague, 67 N.C. 355 (N.C. 1872).

67 N.C. 355 (Ogburn v. Teague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cotten
163 S.E.2d 100 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)