Ogburn v. Loop Land & Irrigation Co.

202 S.W. 366, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 297
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 28, 1918·No. No. 825.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HARPER, C. J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract of sale of land. According to the transcript, the following is a description of what is termed “judgment entered.” It recites:

“Be it remembered that upon this, the 13th day of June, 1917, the above styled and numbered cause came on for trial, and, after considering the evidence offered, the court finds that the following facts have been established:
[Then follows a copy of the findings of facts and conclusions of law appearing upon other pages of the transcript.]”

There is no declaration of the court pronouncing the legal consequences of the facts-found, without which there is no final judgment such as to give this court jurisdiction-to ..consider and determine the questions involved. The appeal must therefore be dismissed at cost of appellant. Trammell v. Rosen, 106 Tex. 132, 157 S. W. 1161.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogburn v. Loop Land & Irrigation Co., 202 S.W. 366, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 297 (Tex. Ct. App. 1918).

202 S.W. 366 (Ogburn v. Loop Land & Irrigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Speer v. Stover
711 S.W.2d 730 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)