Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Tennessee·Decided January 14, 1998·No. 01A01-9707-CH-00284·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

FILED January 14, 1998

ROBERT OGBURN, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 96-1806-I(II) VS. ) ) Appeal No. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ) 01A01-9707-CH-00284 CORRECTION, ET AL., ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )

DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that the Department of Correction was not required to promulgate Policy 502.02 as a rule in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act. See Mandela v. Campbell, App. No. 01A01-9607-CH-00332, 1996 WL 730289, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 1996), perm. app. granted (Tenn. May 12, 1997) (Koch, J., dissenting).

I concur with the remaining provisions of the opinion.

_______________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections (Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.