Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections

DecidedJanuary 14, 1998

Docket01A01-9707-CH-00284

StatusPublished

This text of Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections (Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ogburn v. Dept. of Corrections, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

FILED January 14, 1998

ROBERT OGBURN, ) Cecil W. Crowson ) Appellate Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellant, ) Davidson Chancery ) No. 96-1806-I(II) VS. ) ) Appeal No. TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF ) 01A01-9707-CH-00284 CORRECTION, ET AL., ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )

DISSENTING OPINION

I respectfully dissent from the court’s conclusion that the Department of Correction was not required to promulgate Policy 502.02 as a rule in accordance with the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act. See Mandela v. Campbell, App. No. 01A01-9607-CH-00332, 1996 WL 730289, at *3 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 1996), perm. app. granted (Tenn. May 12, 1997) (Koch, J., dissenting).

I concur with the remaining provisions of the opinion.

_______________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI