Ogalo v. Campbell University, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Ogalo v. Campbell University, Inc.

131 F. App'x 936

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 19, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2481

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 131 F. App'x 936 (Ogalo v. Campbell University, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ogalo v. Campbell University, Inc., 131 F. App'x 936 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edward 0. Ogalo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ogalo v. Campbell University, No. CA-04-561-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2004). We deny Ogalo’s motions to transfer his action, to consolidate it with pending state matters, and to join the United States Department of Justice and United States Department of Homeland Security as defendants. We also deny his motion for a change of venue. We also deny Ogalo’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Edward 0. Ogalo appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ogalo v. Campbell University, No. CA-04-561-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 2004). We deny Ogalo’s motions to transfer his action, to consolidate it with pending state matters, and to join the United States Department of Justice and United States Department of Homeland Security as defendants. We also deny his motion for a change of venue. We also deny Ogalo’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 F. App'x 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ogalo-v-campbell-university-inc-ca4-2005.