O'Frias v. Melton

261 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 638, 313 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1221
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 15, 1970·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that the judgment procured by respondent in the summary proceeding and the attendant stipulation entered into by the parties collaterally estop appellants from asserting the present cause of action (Reich v. Cochran, 151 N. Y. 122). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O'Frias v. Melton, 261 N.E.2d 670, 27 N.Y.2d 638, 313 N.Y.S.2d 765, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1221 (N.Y. 1970).

261 N.E.2d 670 (O'Frias v. Melton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Olivo
2025 NY Slip Op 04687 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Capolino v. Bua
63 A.D.3d 1092 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Chopra v. Prusik
9 Misc. 3d 42 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Nissequogue Boat Club v. State
9 A.D.3d 454 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Collins v. Barbaro
307 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Mark v. William Muschel, Inc.
135 Misc. 2d 804 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1987)
Dowsey v. Megerian
117 A.D.2d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Finkelman v. Finkelman
105 A.D.2d 771 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Gross v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.
103 Misc. 2d 417 (New York Supreme Court, 1980)