Ofisi v. Bnp Paribas S.A.
This text of Ofisi v. Bnp Paribas S.A. (Ofisi v. Bnp Paribas S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MARY OFISI, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 15-2010 (JDB)
AL SHAMAL ISLAMIC BANK, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of [ECF No. 96] plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims
against defendant Al Shamal Islamic Bank, and the entire record herein, it is hereby
ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED; it is further
ORDERED that plaintiffs’ claims against Al Shamal Islamic Bank are hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2); and it
is further
ORDERED that each party shall bear their own costs.
SO ORDERED.
/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge
Dated: May 10, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ofisi v. Bnp Paribas S.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ofisi-v-bnp-paribas-sa-dcd-2022.