Officer Endsley, Individually and Acting in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff v. David Krutilek, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Natasha Revet Krutilek
This text of Officer Endsley, Individually and Acting in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff v. David Krutilek, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Natasha Revet Krutilek (Officer Endsley, Individually and Acting in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff v. David Krutilek, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Natasha Revet Krutilek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-06-00003-CV
OFFICER ENDSLEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND
ACTING IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DEPUTY SHERIFF, Appellant
Â
V.
DAVID KRUTILEK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF
NATASHA REVET KRUTILEK, Appellee
                                             Â
On Appeal from the 123rd Judicial District Court
Panola County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2003-038-A
                                                Â
Before Morriss, C.J., Ross and Carter, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
MEMORANDUM OPINION
            Officer Stephen Endsley has appealed from the denial of his motions for summary judgment based on claims of official immunity. The record was filed January 27, 2006, and the appellant filed his brief March 8, 2006. After two extensions, the appellee's brief was due May 8, 2006. Our Clerk's office has attempted to contact counsel on several occasions. We have been informed by staff for counsel in both offices that the matter has been finally settled, and staff at the appellant's office informed us over ten days ago that a motion to dismiss would be promptly filed. No such motion has been filed, and our subsequent efforts to contact counsel have been without result, as counsel has failed to return our telephone calls or to otherwise contact this Court.
            We dismiss the appeal.
                                                                        Josh R. Morriss, III
                                                                        Chief Justice
Date Submitted:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â June 12, 2006
Date Submitted:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â June 13, 2006
Hidden="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
                       Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
                                               ______________________________
                                                            No. 06-10-00054-CR
                                               ______________________________
                                RICKY LYNN BAKER, JR., Appellant
                                                               V.
                                    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
                                                                                                 Â
                                      On Appeal from the 188th Judicial District Court
                                                            Gregg County, Texas
                                                         Trial Court No. 38,030-A
                                                                                                 Â
                                         Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
                                             Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
                                                    MEMORANDUM OPINION
           Ricky Lynn Baker, Jr., appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion is signed by Baker and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2.
           Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
                                                                       Jack Carter
                                                                       Justice
Date Submitted:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â September 7, 2010
Date Decided:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â September 8, 2010
Do Not Publish         Â
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Officer Endsley, Individually and Acting in His Official Capacity as Deputy Sheriff v. David Krutilek, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Natasha Revet Krutilek, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/officer-endsley-individually-and-acting-in-his-official-capacity-as-deputy-texapp-2006.