Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. County

Fifth Circuit

Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. County

73 F. 1022, 19 C.C.A. 681, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1879

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 5, 1896

DocketNo. 455

StatusPublished

This text of 73 F. 1022 (Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. County, 73 F. 1022, 19 C.C.A. 681, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1879 (5th Cir. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration was properly sustained. The argument in this court suggests that the plaintiff in error may, notwithstanding, have a valid claim against the .county of Elbert, and that the judgment of the circuit court should be without prejudice' to the prosecution of such claim. The judgment is amended by adding the words “without prejudice,” and, as so amended, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The demurrer to the plaintiff’s declaration was properly sustained. The argument in this court suggests that the plaintiff in error may, notwithstanding, have a valid claim against the .county of Elbert, and that the judgment of the circuit court should be without prejudice' to the prosecution of such claim. The judgment is amended by adding the words “without prejudice,” and, as so amended, is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 F. 1022, 19 C.C.A. 681, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 1879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-specialty-manufg-co-v-county-ca5-1896.