Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rhees

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rhees

2003 WI 110, 665 N.W.2d 256, 263 Wis. 2d 703, 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 609

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided July 9, 2003·No. No. 03-1148-D·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[705] IT IS ORDERED that the license of Attorney Michael L. Rhees to practice law in the State of Wisconsin be suspended for four months from the date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this suspension does not affect the existing 1989 suspension for noncompliance with CLE reporting requirements which would also have to be satisfied in order for his license to practice law in Wisconsin to be reinstated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that he shall comply, if he has not already done so, with the requirements of SCR 22.26 pertaining to activities following suspension.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[705] IT IS ORDERED that the license of Attorney Michael L. Rhees to practice law in the State of Wisconsin be suspended for four months from the date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this suspension does not affect the existing 1989 suspension for noncompliance with CLE reporting requirements which would also have to be satisfied in order for his license to practice law in Wisconsin to be reinstated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that he shall comply, if he has not already done so, with the requirements of SCR 22.26 pertaining to activities following suspension.

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rhees, 2003 WI 110, 665 N.W.2d 256, 263 Wis. 2d 703, 2003 Wisc. LEXIS 609 (Wis. 2003).

Pincite

2003 WI 110 (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Rhees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related