Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ray

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ray

2011 WI 17, 797 N.W.2d 788, 332 Wis. 2d 274, 2011 Wisc. LEXIS 151

CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 16, 2011

DocketNos. 2001AP1784-D & 2003AP1743-D

StatusPublished

This text of 2011 WI 17 (Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Ray, 2011 WI 17, 797 N.W.2d 788, 332 Wis. 2d 274, 2011 Wisc. LEXIS 151 (Wis. 2011).

Pincite

Opinions

[276]*276The referee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation are approved and adopted. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the file be placed under seal because it contains confidential information; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the day of this order, Virginia Rose Ray pay to the Office of Lawyer Regulation the costs of this proceeding, which total $30,354.68 as of January 3, 2011.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[276]*276The referee's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation are approved and adopted. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for reinstatement is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the file be placed under seal because it contains confidential information; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 60 days of the day of this order, Virginia Rose Ray pay to the Office of Lawyer Regulation the costs of this proceeding, which total $30,354.68 as of January 3, 2011.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2011 WI 17, 797 N.W.2d 788, 332 Wis. 2d 274, 2011 Wisc. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-lawyer-regulation-v-ray-wis-2011.