OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION v. Nash

29 So. 3d 343, 2010 WL 322172

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2010·No. 5D09-1099·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

29 So.3d 343 (2010)

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, Appellant,
v.
Robert G. NASH, Appellee.

No. 5D09-1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 26, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 11, 2010.

Robert J. Sniffen and Todd D. Engelhardt, of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Edward R. Gay, Orlando, for Appellee.

*344 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rehman v. Florida Dep't of Law Enforcement, 681 So.2d 854 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

SAWAYA, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

29 So.3d 343 (2010)

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION, Appellant,
v.
Robert G. NASH, Appellee.

No. 5D09-1099.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 26, 2010. Rehearing Denied March 11, 2010.

Robert J. Sniffen and Todd D. Engelhardt, of Sniffen & Spellman, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Edward R. Gay, Orlando, for Appellee.

*344 PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Rehman v. Florida Dep't of Law Enforcement, 681 So.2d 854 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

SAWAYA, LAWSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION v. Nash, 29 So. 3d 343, 2010 WL 322172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

29 So. 3d 343 (OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION v. Nash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. State

29 So. 3d 343 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)