Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zell

814 A.2d 175, 572 Pa. 230, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 3166

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 18, 2002

DocketNo. 795 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 814 A.2d 175 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Zell, 814 A.2d 175, 572 Pa. 230, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 3166 (Pa. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2002, a Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on October 25, 2002 and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Rule is made absolute and respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.; and

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may [231]*231appear necessary to protect the rights and interests of respondent’s clients.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI