Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yonashiro

Hawaii Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yonashiro

DecidedJune 9, 2011

DocketSCAD-11-0000400

StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yonashiro (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yonashiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yonashiro, (haw 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-11-0000400 09-JUN-2011 08:00 AM SCAD-11-0000400

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

DAMON T. YONASHIRO, Respondent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

In re Application for the Reinstatement of DAMON T. YONASHIRO, Applicant.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 99-237-6067)

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ. and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura, in place of Acoba, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the record and the Disciplinary Board’s Report and Recommendation for the Reinstatement of Damon T. Yonashiro to the Practice of Law, it appears Applicant Yonashiro has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, rehabilitation, fitness to practice law, competence, compliance with applicable disciplinary orders and rules, and compliance with all requirements imposed by this court, as required by Rule 2.17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant Yonashiro is reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon payment of all required dues and registration fees, as well as any costs awarded upon a timely submission of a bill of costs, the Clerk shall restore Applicant Yonashiro to the roll of attorneys eligible to practice in the State of Hawai#i. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 9, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Craig H. Nakamura

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-11-0000400 09-JUN-2011 08:00 AM SCAD-11-0000400

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

DAMON T. YONASHIRO, Respondent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

In re Application for the Reinstatement of DAMON T. YONASHIRO, Applicant.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 99-237-6067)

ORDER OF REINSTATEMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ. and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura, in place of Acoba, J., recused)

Upon consideration of the record and the Disciplinary Board’s Report and Recommendation for the Reinstatement of Damon T. Yonashiro to the Practice of Law, it appears Applicant Yonashiro has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, rehabilitation, fitness to practice law, competence, compliance with applicable disciplinary orders and rules, and compliance with all requirements imposed by this court, as required by Rule 2.17(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant Yonashiro is reinstated to the practice of law in this jurisdiction. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon payment of all required dues and registration fees, as well as any costs awarded upon a timely submission of a bill of costs, the Clerk shall restore Applicant Yonashiro to the roll of attorneys eligible to practice in the State of Hawai#i. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 9, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Craig H. Nakamura

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Yonashiro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-yonashiro-haw-2011.