Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Witt

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Witt

684 N.E.2d 82, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1235

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 2, 1997

DocketNo. 97-820

StatusPublished

This text of 684 N.E.2d 82 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Witt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Witt, 684 N.E.2d 82, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1235 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that pursuant to GovJBar R. V(11)(F); respondent, Otto Phillip Witt, Attorney Registration No. 0056574, last known address in Shaker Heights, Ohio, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this court that pursuant to GovJBar R. V(11)(F); respondent, Otto Phillip Witt, Attorney Registration No. 0056574, last known address in Shaker Heights, Ohio, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

684 N.E.2d 82, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-witt-ohio-1997.