Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams

553 N.E.2d 1082, 51 Ohio St. 3d 36, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 205
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 9, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2171
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 553 N.E.2d 1082 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams, 553 N.E.2d 1082, 51 Ohio St. 3d 36, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 205 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree with the-board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 5-103(A), 5-107(A)(l), and 1-102(A)(5). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Pheils
2011 Ohio 2906 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Rancman v. Interim Settlement Funding Corp.
789 N.E.2d 217 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Allen Cty. Bar Assn. v. Williams
2001 Ohio 160 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)
Allen County Bar Ass'n v. Williams
748 N.E.2d 1101 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 N.E.2d 1082, 51 Ohio St. 3d 36, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-williams-ohio-1990.