Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitehead
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitehead (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 06-FEB-2019 SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 01:42 PM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
WILLIAM H. WHITEHEAD, III, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 18-O-007)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the reply filed by Respondent William H. Whitehead III to this court’s November 7, 2018 notice and order of contemplated reciprocal discipline, pursuant to Rule 2.15(b) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and the record in this matter, it clearly appears that the conduct established therein does not warrant discipline in this jurisdiction. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel for the imposition of reciprocal discipline is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, February 6, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Whitehead, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-whitehead-haw-2019.