Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wasserstrom

829 A.2d 671
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 24, 2003
DocketNo. 612 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
StatusPublished

This text of 829 A.2d 671 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wasserstrom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wasserstrom, 829 A.2d 671 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2003, there having been filed with this Court by David E. Wasserstrom his verified Statement of Resignation dated May 20, 2003, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of David E. Wasserstrom be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania retroactive to November 17, 2000; and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
829 A.2d 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-wasserstrom-pa-2003.