Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace

729 N.E.2d 343, 89 Ohio St. 3d 113
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 31, 2000
DocketNo. 99-1866
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 729 N.E.2d 343 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace, 729 N.E.2d 343, 89 Ohio St. 3d 113 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s repeated attempts to mislead his client constitute a course of conduct in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4), which warrants an actual suspension from the practice of law. Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh (1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 191, 658 N.E.2d 237, 240. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months. Cost are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace
2014 Ohio 1128 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Broeren
115 Ohio St. 3d 473 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Stollings
855 N.E.2d 479 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeLong
786 N.E.2d 1280 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Wallace
763 N.E.2d 1154 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
729 N.E.2d 343, 89 Ohio St. 3d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-wallace-ohio-2000.