Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Vinokur

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Vinokur

817 A.2d 444

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 24, 2003

DocketNo. 808 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 817 A.2d 444 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Vinokur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Vinokur, 817 A.2d 444 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2003, the Joint Petition to Temporarily Suspend an Attorney is granted and Leon Lewis Vinokur is placed on temporary suspension pending the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings against him in Delaware and until further Order of this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 24th day of January, 2003, the Joint Petition to Temporarily Suspend an Attorney is granted and Leon Lewis Vinokur is placed on temporary suspension pending the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings against him in Delaware and until further Order of this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

817 A.2d 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-vinokur-pa-2003.