Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Timonere

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Timonere

660 N.E.2d 1171, 74 Ohio St. 3d 629
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 1996
DocketNo. 94-2646
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 660 N.E.2d 1171 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Timonere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Timonere, 660 N.E.2d 1171, 74 Ohio St. 3d 629 (Ohio 1996).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur that respondent violated DR 1 — 102(A)(3) and (6). We also agree that respondent’s egregious misconduct deserves the full measure of our disciplinary authority. Respondent is therefore ordered permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Neal
866 N.E.2d 503 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Timonere
1996 Ohio 109 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 N.E.2d 1171, 74 Ohio St. 3d 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-timonere-ohio-1996.