Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Thomas

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Thomas

669 N.E.2d 833, 76 Ohio St. 3d 578, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1268

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1996·No. No. 96-986·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Based on upon our review of the record, the court adopts the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months, with the suspension stayed on condition that for two years from the date of the announcement of this order respondent continue his participation with OLAP and remain drug and alcohol free, be subject to random urine analysis, and continue his attendance at either AA, Narcotics Anonymous, or AL-ANON meetings. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Based on upon our review of the record, the court adopts the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months, with the suspension stayed on condition that for two years from the date of the announcement of this order respondent continue his participation with OLAP and remain drug and alcohol free, be subject to random urine analysis, and continue his attendance at either AA, Narcotics Anonymous, or AL-ANON meetings. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Stratton, JJ., concur.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Thomas, 669 N.E.2d 833, 76 Ohio St. 3d 578, 1996 Ohio LEXIS 1268 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

669 N.E.2d 833 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related