Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor

677 N.E.2d 1188, 78 Ohio St. 3d 312
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 30, 1997
DocketNo. 96-2479
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 677 N.E.2d 1188 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor, 677 N.E.2d 1188, 78 Ohio St. 3d 312 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Taylor
1997 Ohio 211 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 N.E.2d 1188, 78 Ohio St. 3d 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-taylor-ohio-1997.