Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tagliaferri

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tagliaferri

897 A.2d 1158

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 3, 2006

DocketNo. 1110 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 897 A.2d 1158 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tagliaferri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tagliaferri, 897 A.2d 1158 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Certifícate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board File No. C2-05-328, it is hereby

ORDERED that Alfred J. Tagliaferri is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court, and he shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Certifícate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board File No. C2-05-328, it is hereby

ORDERED that Alfred J. Tagliaferri is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further Order of the Court, and he shall comply with Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Madame Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

897 A.2d 1158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-tagliaferri-pa-2006.