Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache

651 A.2d 524

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 28, 1994

DocketNo. 71 Disciplinary Docket No. 3; Board File Nos. C1-92-978, C1-93-517, C1-93-865, C1-94-663 and C1-94-823

StatusPublished

This text of 651 A.2d 524 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Tache, 651 A.2d 524 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of October, 1994, an Order and Rule to Show Cause having been entered by this Court on September 26, 1994, upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursu- ■ ant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa.R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may be necessary to protect fully the rights and interests of respondent’s clients.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI