Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sweeney

679 N.E.2d 671, 79 Ohio St. 3d 33
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 18, 1997
DocketNo. 97-440
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 679 N.E.2d 671 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sweeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sweeney, 679 N.E.2d 671, 79 Ohio St. 3d 33 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and. recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sweeney
1997 Ohio 92 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 N.E.2d 671, 79 Ohio St. 3d 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-sweeney-ohio-1997.