Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Susman

795 A.2d 957, 568 Pa. 302, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 842
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 26, 2002·No. No. 522, Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2002, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 4, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that GERALD S. SUSMAN, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three (3) years, retroactive to May 10, 1999, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

[303] Justice SAYLOR dissents, as he would impose a five-year suspension as recommended by dissenting Board Member Caroselli.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Susman, 795 A.2d 957, 568 Pa. 302, 2002 Pa. LEXIS 842 (Pa. 2002).

795 A.2d 957 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Susman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Susman
876 A.2d 637 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 2005)