Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley

658 N.E.2d 261, 74 Ohio St. 3d 218

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 10, 1996

DocketNo. 95-1672

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 658 N.E.2d 261 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley, 658 N.E.2d 261, 74 Ohio St. 3d 218 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), and 6-101(A)(3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), V(4)(G), and VI. We also agree with the sanction recom[221]*221mended for this misconduct. Respondent is therefore permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(5), 1-102(A)(6), and 6-101(A)(3), as well as Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), V(4)(G), and VI. We also agree with the sanction recom[221]*221mended for this misconduct. Respondent is therefore permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 N.E.2d 261, 74 Ohio St. 3d 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-stanley-ohio-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack