Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford

607 N.E.2d 830, 66 Ohio St. 3d 39
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 3, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2169
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 607 N.E.2d 830 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanford, 607 N.E.2d 830, 66 Ohio St. 3d 39 (Ohio 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Respondent’s crime was a serious breach of trust. However, the record indicates remorse, and we believe there may be potential for rehabilitation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio without credit for time previously spent under suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Williams
84 Ohio St. 3d 392 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
607 N.E.2d 830, 66 Ohio St. 3d 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-stanford-ohio-1993.