Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spaulding

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spaulding

821 A.2d 583

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 27, 2003

DocketNo. 826 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 821 A.2d 583 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spaulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Spaulding, 821 A.2d 583 (Pa. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2003, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges against him in connection with Disciplinary Docket No. 118 DB 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that Joseph C. Spaulding be placed on inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further order of the Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2003, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from a disabling condition which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to disciplinary charges against him in connection with Disciplinary Docket No. 118 DB 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that Joseph C. Spaulding be placed on inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E., for an indefinite period and until further order of the Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall meanwhile be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

821 A.2d 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-spaulding-pa-2003.