Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smakula
529 N.E.2d 1376, 39 Ohio St. 3d 143, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 334
This text of 529 N.E.2d 1376 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smakula) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smakula, 529 N.E.2d 1376, 39 Ohio St. 3d 143, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 334 (Ohio 1988).
Opinion
This court concurs in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Martinez
2016 Ohio 2709 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Hale
2014 Ohio 5053 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Hayes v. State Medical Board of Ohio
742 N.E.2d 238 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2000)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris
1996 Ohio 418 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Norris
666 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Smakula
47 Ohio St. 3d 136 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
529 N.E.2d 1376, 39 Ohio St. 3d 143, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-smakula-ohio-1988.