Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens

586 N.E.2d 92, 63 Ohio St. 3d 162, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 265
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 11, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1741
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 586 N.E.2d 92 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens, 586 N.E.2d 92, 63 Ohio St. 3d 162, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 265 (Ohio 1992).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Our review of the record supports the board’s findings and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with appropriate restitution to be [164]*164made prior to any application respondent files for reinstatement to the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Douglas and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Holmes, Wright and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would disbar respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Tomlan
118 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Cook
2002 Ohio 5787 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas
1996 Ohio 421 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas
666 N.E.2d 1083 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Sheehy
1995 Ohio 315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clark
1994 Ohio 233 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
586 N.E.2d 92, 63 Ohio St. 3d 162, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 265, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-slavens-ohio-1992.