Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens
586 N.E.2d 92, 63 Ohio St. 3d 162, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 265
Opinion
Our review of the record supports the board’s findings and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio with appropriate restitution to be [164] made prior to any application respondent files for reinstatement to the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens, 586 N.E.2d 92, 63 Ohio St. 3d 162, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 265 (Ohio 1992).
586 N.E.2d 92 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Slavens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Tomlan
118 Ohio St. 3d 1 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2008)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Cook
2002 Ohio 5787 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
Byron v. Carlin, Unpublished Decision (12-14-2001)
Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001
Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas
1996 Ohio 421 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Galinas
666 N.E.2d 1083 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)
Toledo Bar Assn. v. Sheehy
1995 Ohio 315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clark
1994 Ohio 233 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)