Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sitoski

674 A.2d 1036, 544 Pa. 88, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 889

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 1996·No. No. 189, Disciplinary Docket; No. 3—Supreme Court; No. 77 DB 93—Disciplinary Board·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 21,1996, it is hereby

ORDERED that ROBERT M. SITOSKI, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one (1) year, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

[89]*89It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J., dissents and would suspend respondent for a period of four months.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 21st day of March, 1996, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 21,1996, it is hereby

ORDERED that ROBERT M. SITOSKI, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one (1) year, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

[89]*89It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J., dissents and would suspend respondent for a period of four months.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sitoski, 674 A.2d 1036, 544 Pa. 88, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 889 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

674 A.2d 1036 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sitoski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.