Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon

644 N.E.2d 309, 71 Ohio St. 3d 437
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1994·No. No. 94-1814·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On review, we agree with the board’s finding of facts, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, we publicly reprimand respondent and tax costs to him.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Pfeifer, J., dissenting. I would dismiss the case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon, 644 N.E.2d 309, 71 Ohio St. 3d 437 (Ohio 1994).

644 N.E.2d 309 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Billingsley
2024 Ohio 222 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2024)
Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Macejko (Slip Opinion)
2022 Ohio 322 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2022)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mecklenborg
2014 Ohio 1908 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2014)
Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Dougherty
105 Ohio St. 3d 307 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2005)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon
1994 Ohio 11 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)