Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall

544 N.E.2d 235, 45 Ohio St. 3d 601, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 187
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Ohio St. 3d 604
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 9, 1989·No. No. D.D. 84-10·Published

Opinion

Respondent’s second application for reinstatement to the practice of law is granted. Herschel M. Sigall is reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. (For earlier cases, see [1984], 14 Ohio St. 3d 15, 14 OBR 320, 470 N.E. 2d 886, and [1989], 42 Ohio St. 3d 604, 538 N.E. 2d 109.)

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall, 544 N.E.2d 235, 45 Ohio St. 3d 601, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 187 (Ohio 1989).

544 N.E.2d 235 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall
470 N.E.2d 886 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sigall
538 N.E.2d 109 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)