Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shreve

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shreve

637 A.2d 268

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 3, 1994

DocketNo. 890, Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board Nos. 89 DB 91 and 1 DB 92

StatusPublished

This text of 637 A.2d 268 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shreve) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shreve, 637 A.2d 268 (Pa. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 1994, a Rule having been issued upon respondent on November 16, 1993, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa. R.D.E., and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; respondent is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E.; and he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of February, 1994, a Rule having been issued upon respondent on November 16, 1993, to show cause why he should not be placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa. R.D.E., and no response thereto having been filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute; respondent is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E.; and he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

637 A.2d 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-shreve-pa-1994.