Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley

648 N.E.2d 1352, 72 Ohio St. 3d 244
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1995·No. No. 95-9·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As respondent has offered no reason why he should not receive discipline comparable to that imposed by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, we hereby publicly reprimand respondent. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley, 648 N.E.2d 1352, 72 Ohio St. 3d 244 (Ohio 1995).

648 N.E.2d 1352 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sheatsley
1995 Ohio 15 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)