Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw

472 N.E.2d 1075, 15 Ohio St. 3d 125, 15 Ohio B. 275, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1277
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 31, 1984·No. D.D. No. 84-37·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), DR 7-101 (A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.

Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw, 472 N.E.2d 1075, 15 Ohio St. 3d 125, 15 Ohio B. 275, 1984 Ohio LEXIS 1277 (Ohio 1984).

472 N.E.2d 1075 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence
1995 Ohio 242 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lawrence
650 N.E.2d 867 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)
Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Gross
478 N.E.2d 792 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)
Bar Ass'n v. Kless
476 N.E.2d 1035 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1985)