Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sereno

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 2020
DocketSCAD-19-0000571
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sereno (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sereno) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sereno, (haw 2020).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 15-JAN-2020 08:02 AM

SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

DAVID A. SERENO, (HI bar #4739) Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case No. 18-0330)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the December 23, 2019 report

filed in this matter by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC),

ODC’s August 13, 2019 petition, requesting the immediate

suspension of Respondent David A. Sereno from the practice of

law, pursuant to Rule 2.12A of the Rules of the Supreme Court of

the State of Hawai#i (RSCH), and the record, we find that

Respondent Sereno has failed to meaningfully or substantively

respond to lawful requests from ODC regarding its two

investigations into alleged misconduct committed by him.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.12A,

Respondent Sereno is suspended from the practice of law. This

order is effective immediately and until further order of this

court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order imposing

suspension upon Respondent Sereno shall constitute a suspension

for purposes of RSCH Rule 2.16. The Disciplinary Board of the

Hawai#i Supreme Court and Respondent Sereno shall therefore

comply with the relevant requirements of that Rule.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forthwith

distribute a copy of this order to all judges, pursuant to RSCH

Rule 2.16(f). Distribution may be by electronic mail.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 15, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Sereno, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-sereno-haw-2020.